data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b79ea/b79ea37920641e621e1a4e51d1e10aea95ace669" alt="Sinking ship simulator no"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d2fd/8d2fdc17eff01ad2b0f6cac750d8237f4bd24ab4" alt="sinking ship simulator no sinking ship simulator no"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8024/f8024f350c5a72daa1c89c9d1eb0978cd6c17798" alt="sinking ship simulator no sinking ship simulator no"
Drawing on the firm–director interdependence perspective, we predict that director candidates’ social capital and human capital have inverted U-shaped effects on their likelihood of joining a declining firm. We apply this perspective to address a puzzle regarding director appointment in declining firms: Declining firms are often motivated to bring in director candidates with high resource endowments to help enact turnarounds, but these candidates may not join a declining firm’s board due to the potential uncertainties and reputational loss of doing so. We develop a firm–director interdependence perspective to theorize director appointments as the outcome of a mutual selection process in which firms and director candidates select each other based on their organizational and personal dependencies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b79ea/b79ea37920641e621e1a4e51d1e10aea95ace669" alt="Sinking ship simulator no"